Header Widget

Understanding Direct and Indirect Speech Acts: A Study of Student Comprehension

Introduction

The research goal focused on determining students’ ability to comprehend indirect speech acts. Users of language perform indirect speech acts by delivering a message which goes beyond the straight interpretation of their words. When a person states, "Can you pass me the salt?" they seek voluntary assistance rather than assessing the other person's aptitude. Maximum effectiveness of indirect speech acts comes from their ability to be polite as well as showing respect. Such utterances also allow for subtle communication.

Method

The research utilised three different prompts, which presented questions from direct to indirect, to interview people. The prompts were as follows:

1. "Please get a side."

2. "Would you like to get a side?"

3. "I hope you're not blocking my way."

The directness of the initial command in this prompt made it clear what action the listener should perform. The second prompt displayed indirectness through its presentation that offered the listener the freedom to decide whether to take the recommendation. The third prompt demonstrated indirectness through hopeful expressions, although it failed to request any change of behaviour from the listener.

My participant selection process involved recruiting people from various networking levels, including friends, schoolmates and connections outside of school. I detailed both the research aims, interview procedure and received consent from every participant. Each participant received individual interviews followed by a notebook-based recording of their answers.

The table below shows the responses of each participant to each prompt.

Participant

Prompt 1: “Get a side.”

Prompt 2: “Would you like to get a side?”

Prompt 3: “I hope you are not blocking my way.”

1

“What do you mean?”

“Yes, please. What sides do you have?”

“Oh, sorry. I’ll move.”

2

“I’m good, thanks.”

“No, thank you.”

“No, I’m not.”

3

“Are you telling me to order a side?”

“Yes, I think I will.”

“No, I’m not. Please go ahead.”

4

“I’m not sure what you mean.”

“Yes, I’ll have a side of fries.”

“Oh, sorry. I’ll move out of the way.”

5

“Why should I get a side?”

“I’m not sure. What sides do you have?”

“No, I’m not. I’m just standing here.”

 

Discussion

The research established that 80% of participants grasped the underlying message behind the indirect speech acts which appeared in the prompts.

Four out of five participants correctly interpreted my directive to order a side when I used the first prompt, "Get a side." The evaluation process became confusing for Participant 1 when they needed me to clarify the literal message. The individual might not have recognised the expression "side" when used in this fashion or maybe did not expect direct language from me.

The order request "Would you like to get a side?" appeared in Prompt 2. By using an indirect and well-mannered approach within the second prompt, the participants could choose either to get a side or decline it. All participants grasped the intended idea of this command from the prompt during their exchanges. Fast-food restaurants utilise this particular phrasing to ask customers because it represents a standard approach for service requests.

Among the three prompts, "I hope you are not blocking my way" stood as the most mumbled and implicit message. The statement expressed a concerned desire that the participant was not preventing me from passing through. It still lacked direct instructions to move aside. The goal of this indirect prompt was successful since it reached its target meaning to make four participants shift position or express remorse for blocking my path. The fourth participant interpreted the indirect nature of the question poorly because they replied by stating they did not block my path. It seems that they failed to understand my position of authority or did not consider my emotions or preferences.

The responses from participants depended on their background information along with their level of acquaintance with me. Participant 2 answered questions in a relaxed manner compared to the formality shown by Participant 3. The responses from Participant 4 who knew me decreased in formality compared to Participant 5, who was unfamiliar with me. Social norms between different relationship types most likely determine these variable forms of communication.

Conclusion

Research shows that most students interpret indirect speech acts correctly, while specific students need extra clarification when indirect speech elements are obscure.

Teachers and adults who interact with students should follow these recommendations:

A small percentage of students need assistance in processing indirect speech acts.

Direct and easy communication should be your focus before giving instructions to others.

Give students enough context about the intended meaning when delivering statements through indirect speech.

Treat students with understanding when they fail to grasp indirect speech expressions. The direct explanation may be needed when presenting it to students.

References

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
  • Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 59-82). Academic Press.
  • Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

 

Post a Comment

0 Comments